Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Herald

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 2014No. CC 090666375; CA A146603; SC S061362PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, J.

In Swan and Swan, 301 Or 167, 176, 720 P2d 747 (1986), this court, applying preemption principles, stated that it violated federal law for “[f]amily courts, in making a division of property, [to] consider Social Security benefits.” The question presented in this case — where one spouse is a Social Security participant and the other is not — is whether federal law forbids a division of property by which the value of retirement benefits belonging to the nonparticipating spouse is reduced by the present value of hypothetical Social Security benefits to which that spouse would have been entitled…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Flemming v. NestorSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Crosby v. National Foreign Trade CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. McCarty v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. In Re BurrusSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  5. Hisquierdo v. HisquierdoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Chateau Foghorn LP v. HosfordCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2017
  2. Dunmore v. DunmoreAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
  3. In re the Marriage of CodeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  4. In re MaldonadoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  5. In re the Marriage of JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API