Legal Opinion

Beard v. WakeMed

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 4, 2014No. COA13-723PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STROUD, Judge.

Defendants appeal opinion and award awarding workers’ compensation benefits to plaintiff and order denying their motion for reconsideration. For the following reasons, we affirm.

I. Background

On or about 25 April 2011, defendant entered a Form 19, “EMPLOYER’S REPORT OF EMPLOYEE’S INJURY OR OCCUPATIONAL DISEASE TO THE INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION” (“report”). The report stated that plaintiff, a staff nurse, “was pulling a patient in their bed and felt lower back pain.” On or about 2 May 2011, plaintiff’s workers’ compensation claim was denied for the following reasons:

- Your injury was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Russell v. Lowes Product DistributionCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  2. Richardson v. Maxim Healthcare/Allegis GroupSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2008
  3. Cummins v. BCCI Construction EnterprisesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  4. Yingling v. Bank of AmericaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  5. Owens v. STANDARD MINERAL COMPANYCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Garrett v. The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
  2. Dominguez v. Francisco Dominguez Masonry, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015
  3. Willard v. VP Builders, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API