Legal Opinion
Rose v. Champlin Refining Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided December 6, 1938No. 28585PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Per curiam
This is an original proceeding in this court brought by James M. Rose, hereafter referred to as petitioner, to obtain a review, of an order made by the State Industrial Commission on April II, 1938, and which denied him an additional award against Champlin Refining Company, hereafter referred to as respondent.
The record herein shows that petitioner, while in the employ of the respondent and engaged in an employment defined as hazardous by the Workmen’s Compensation Act (O. S. 1931, section 13348 et seq. as amended, 85 Okla. St. Ann. sec. 1 et seq.), on March 26, 1930, sustained an accidental…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Standard Roofing & Material Co. v. MosleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Banning v. Peru-Laclede Syndicate, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Barnsdall Oil Co. v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Brown Bros. v. ParksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Deep Rock Oil Corp. v. EvansSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Souder v. Mid-Continent Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
- Skaggs v. M. & W. Mining Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
- Roberts v. Magnolia Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
- Osborne v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
- Daugherty v. ITT Continental Baking CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.