Legal Opinion

National Family Farm Coalition v. Vilsack

District Court, N.D. California

Decided December 2, 2024No. 3:21-cv-05695Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 NATIONAL FAMILY FARM COALITION Case No. 21-cv-05695-JD et al., 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER RE SUMMARY JUDGMENT 9 v. 10 TOM VILSACK et al., 11 Defendants. 12 13 In 2004, the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS), housed within the U.S. 14 Department of Agriculture (USDA), announced the intention to revisit regulations governing 15 genetically engineered (GE) organisms. APHIS published a notice of proposed rulemaking in 16 2008 that kicked off over a decade of activity and concluded in a final rule the agency…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API