Legal Opinion
Scenic Hudson, Inc. v. Jorling
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 12, 1992PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Mikoll, J. P.
In 1985, respondent Department of Environmental Conservation (hereinafter DEC), following full State Environmental Quality Review Act (ECL art 8) (hereinafter SEQRA) review involving the preparation of a draft environmental impact statement (hereinafter DEIS), public hearings and preparation of a final environmental impact statement (hereinafter FEIS), issued permits to respondent Alsen Coal Terminal, Ltd. authorizing construction of a coal trans-shipment facility on the site of a former cement plant in the Town of Catskill, Greene County. Trains were to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bernstein v. ToiaNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Rosen v. Public Employment Relations BoardNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- New York Public Interest Research Group, Inc. v. Town of IslipNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Village of Hudson Falls v. New York State Department of Environmental ConservationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Village of Hudson Falls v. New York State Department of Environmental ConservationNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
3Cited by4 opinions
- Stephentown Concerned Citizens v. HerrickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Plante v. New York State Department of Environmental ConservationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Stephentown Concerned Citizens v. HerrickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- East 84th Street Neighborhood Ass'n v. Board of Standards & AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995