Legal Opinion

Kellerman v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided October 23, 1974No. 128-73PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKtjNzig, Judge

We face in this suit for back pay and ancillary relief the question of whether the Air Force Systems Command (Systems Command) properly exercised its discretion in refusing to adjust plaintiff’s salary to take advantage of the lifting of á Congressional wage ceiling. We conclude that defendant either had no discretion to act as it did or, alternatively, abused the discretion it exercised. Consequently, we hold for plaintiff.

The material facts are not disputed. Plaintiff, a career Civil Service employee and a preference eligible, was approved on January 10, 1965 as a Public Law 80-313 (P.L.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Newman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1958
  2. Smith v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1960
  3. Nordstrom v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
  4. Baxter v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1954

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Whelan v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
  2. Berney T. Wilburn v. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
  3. Carrasco v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1977
  4. William L. Ginnodo v. Office of Personnel ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
  5. William L. Ginnodo v. Office of Personnel ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API