Legal Opinion
Claim of Barcomb v. Delphi Automotive
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 19, 2007PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCrew Iii, J.
Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed June 8, 2006, which ruled that claimant failed to establish either an occupational disease or an accidental injury and denied his claim for workers’ compensation benefits.
Claimant began working as an assembler for the employer in September 1999. Beginning in January 2004, claimant experienced periodic swelling around his eyes and other portions of his face, breathing difficulties, hives and other related symptoms and ultimately was diagnosed with angioedema and asthma. Claimant’s treating physicians concluded that the foregoing…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Claim of Lopez v. Superflex, Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Marks v. County of TompkinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Knapp v. Vestal Central School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Nicholson v. Mohawk Valley Community CollegeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Claim of Adams v. Univera Health Care/ExcellusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
3Cited by3 opinions
- Duncan v. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Claim of Sandell v. Frito Lay, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Claim of Sandell v. Frito Lay, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013