Legal Opinion

Petersen v. Southern Arizona Bank & Trust Co.

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1939No. Civil No. 4102PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, J.

— This is an action by Southern Arizona Bank & Trust Company, a corporation, hereinafter called the administrator, and Edith Musser and Dorothy Musser, hereinafter called plaintiffs, against William Petersen, as state treasurer and estate tax commissioner, and Neri Osborn, Jr., as estate tax collector of the state of Arizona, hereinafter called de fendants, asking in effect for an injunction prohibiting defendants from taking any proceedings for the assessment or collection of any additional inheritance tax on the estate of William Musser, deceased. The case was heard on an agreed statement…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. O'Malley v. SimsArizona Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Berton v. All Persons, Etc.California Supreme Court · 1917
  3. State of Arizona v. MiserArizona Supreme Court · 1937
  4. In re Estate of RowlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Finnerty v. PennieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. JacobiArizona Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Petersen v. DriscollArizona Supreme Court · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API