Legal Opinion

Chester v. W. A. Murtfeldt Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 26, 1914PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBraley, J.

The plaintiff’s intestate, a sheet metal worker, while in one of the penthouses on the roof of a building in process of construction, fell through a ventilating duct or vent leading to the ground floor, dying shortly after his injuries without conscious suffering. A verdict was ordered for the defendant at the close of the plaintiff’s evidence, and the case is here on the report of the presiding judge.* It being conceded, that due notice of the time, place and cause of the accident was given, only the questions of the due care of the decedent and the defendant’s negligence are presented.

By…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Prince v. Lowell Electric Light Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  2. French v. SabinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  3. Lydon v. Edison Electric Illuminating Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  4. Taylor v. Pierce Bros.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  5. MacDonald v. Edison Electric Illuminating Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Moynihan v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  2. McCulloch v. Inhabitants of NeedhamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  3. Ashton v. Fall River Gas Works Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API