Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Platts v. Pacific First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1941No. 6826Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partGivens, J.

(Concurring in part and dissenting in part) —Equitable relief similar to that accorded the holder of a mortgage against which the statute of limitations has run (i.e., title will not be quieted in the mortgagor unless the debt is paid, though the mortgage could not be affirmatively enforced) is denied respondent Marine Trust Company of Buffalo, holder of a judgment against which the statute of limitations has run, on two premises, first, that the judgment lien was not voluntarily imposed, and second, by inference or implication that the mortgage lien continues, while the judgment lien does…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Hotchkiss v. National City Bank of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1911
  2. Barnes v. American Fertilizer Co.Court of Appeals of Virginia · 1925
  3. Livingston v. . LivingstonNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
  4. Cosper v. the Valley BankArizona Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Shimpones v. StickneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API