Legal Opinion

In Re Grand Jury Subpoena

District Court, W.D. Missouri

Decided November 14, 1978No. 78 0792, 78 0793 CV W 4PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

ELMO B. HUNTER, District Judge.

On application of the United States of America, the grand jury has caused to be served a subpoena duces tecum upon Dr. Sam S. Misasi, as Custodian of Records of Sam S. Misasi, D. O. Incorporated. The subpoena requires production before the grand jury of the following documents with respect to 25 listed patients, including movant William D. Threlkeld:

any and all records of services performed; charges billed; payments received or claims submitted; including but not limited to x-ray film and reports; x-ray books for 1975-1978; chemistry log books for…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. United States v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Wilson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  5. George Campbell Painting Corp. v. ReidSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Robinson v. MagovernDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. In Re Dr. John Doe, M.D., a Witness Before the January 1982 Additional Grand Jury. Dr. John Doe, M.D. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
  3. Schachar v. American Academy of Opthalmology, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1985
  4. United States v. LaytonDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1981
  5. Heilman v. WaldronDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2012

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API