Legal Opinion

United States v. Layton

District Court, N.D. California

Decided May 8, 1981No. CR-80-416-RFPPublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF. SUKH-DEO TAPES

PECKHAM, Chief Judge.

The government seeks to compel defendant to produce tapes made of conversations between himself and Dr. Hardat Sukhdeo. Because we find no authority to compel pretrial disclosure of these materials, and, further, because the materials which the government seeks are privileged under the attorney-client privilege, we deny the government’s motion to compel discovery.

FACTS

Dr. Sukhdeo is the Chief of Psychiatry at Jersey Medical School in New Jersey. According to his declaration, he…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. United States v. NoblesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Whalen v. RoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. State v. KociolekSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
  5. United States v. Wilfredo Alvarez Appeal of John A/K/A Jorge MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Izazaga v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  2. In Re Subpoena Served Upon Jorge S. Zuniga, M.D. In Re Subpoena Served Upon Gary R. Pierce, M.D.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
  3. State v. StandifordUtah Supreme Court · 1988
  4. People v. KnucklesIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
  5. United States v. Darren Jay DennisonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API