Legal Opinion

Blum v. Postal Telegraph, Inc.

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided April 26, 1944No. 2003PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McVICAR, District Judge.

This action is now before us on three motions, the first being the motion of the defendant to dismiss the action against it, etc.; the second is the motion of plaintiff to amend his statement of claim or complaint; and the third is the motion of the Postal Telegraph Cable Company of Pennsylvania to set aside certain service made upon it, etc. We will consider these motions in the order mentioned:

Motion of Defendant to Dismiss, etc.

The defendant moved to vacate or set aside the service of the summons made upon it in this case, to quash the writ and dismiss the action as…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Cannon Manufacturing Co. v. Cudahy Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Hart Steel Co. v. Railroad Supply Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
  3. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. Minneapolis Civic & Commerce Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  4. Gulf Oil Corp. v. LewellynSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  5. United States v. Lehigh Valley RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1911

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Fibreboard Products, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1953
  2. State Ex Rel. Grinnell Co. v. MacPhersonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1957
  3. S.O.S. Co. v. Bolta Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1953
  4. Blum v. Postal Telegraph, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API