Legal Opinion
L.K. ex rel. Q v. Northeast School District
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 19, 2013No. 11 Civ. 8458 (ER)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
EDGARDO RAMOS, District Judge.
Plaintiff L.K. (“Plaintiff’ or the “Parent”) on behalf of her son, Q.S., brings an action against the Northeast School District, also known as Webutuck Central School District (“Defendant” or the “District”) under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (“IDEA”), 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq., seeking to overturn the determination of the State Review Officer (“SRO”) that the District is not required to reimburse the Parent for her unilateral placement of Q.S. at the Kildonan School (“Kildonan”). The parties have filed cross-motions for summary…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley Ex Rel. RowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- School Committee of the Town of Burlington v. Department of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Schaffer Ex Rel. Schaffer v. WeastSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Forest Grove School District v. T. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Robert Walczak and Karen Walczak v. Florida Union Free School District and Maureen FlahertyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- F.O. ex rel. O. v. New York City Department of EducationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- E.M. ex rel. M.M. v. New York City Department of EducationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- W.A. v. Hendrick Hudson Central School DistrictDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016