Legal Opinion
Karp v. City of New Britain
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided April 18, 2000No. AC 18462PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FOTI, J.
The plaintiffs1 appeal from the judgment of the trial court dismissing their zoning appeal. They *313claim that the court improperly (1) dismissed their appeal for lack of compliance with General Statutes § 8-8 (e) and (2) held that § 8-8 (q) could not be invoked to reinstate the appeal. We remand the matter to the trial court for further factual findings relative to the issue of mootness.
The record and briefs disclose the following facts and procedural history. This case involves property in New Britain that the city plan commission and common council voted to rezone from an A-l…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Napoletano v. CIGNA Healthcare of Connecticut, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Loisel v. RoweSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Sadlowski v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Green Rock Ridge, Inc. v. KobernatSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re Jeffrey C.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Taylor v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Town of Southington v. Commercial Union InsuranceConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Kirpas v. Griffin HospitalConnecticut Appellate Court · 2026