Legal Opinion

Barr v. Rader

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided August 13, 1898PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Prom Grant: Morton D. Clifford, Judge. Action for damages by Emmet Barr against George Rader. Judgment for plaintiff and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bean

This action is to recover damages for the seizure, detention, and sale of certain personal property under an *376execution issued at the instigation of the defendant on a judgment which it is alleged had been paid, and is here for the third time on appeal. The decisions in the two former appeals are to be found reported in 29 Or. 399 (45 Pac. 776), and 31 Or. 225 (49 Pac. 962), from which it appears that the only issue of fact in the case is whether the defendant accepted as part payment of an execution previously issued on the judgment in question an account in favor of plaintiff against Harrer…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Vanbebber v. PlunkettOregon Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Wallace v. Suburban Railway Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Herbert v. DufurOregon Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Barr v. CombsOregon Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Barr v. RaderOregon Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Farrin v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Smitson v. Southern Pacific Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Herrick v. BarzeeOregon Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Adamson v. FrazierOregon Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Morgan's EstateOregon Supreme Court · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API