State v. Baldwin
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FIDEL, Presiding Judge.
Fleeta M. Baldwin (“appellant”) appeals her conviction for residential picketing, a class three misdemeanor, in violation of Ariz. Rev.Stat.Ann. (“A.R.S.”) § 13-2909. We affirm. We hold that § 13-2909 is neither impermissibly vague nor overbroad; nor does it violate state or federal guarantees of free speech and religious freedom.
7. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On May 1,1993, the Phoenix police arrested appellant near the home of Dr. Frederic Stimmell, an obstetrieian/gyneeologist whose practice includes abortions. Appellant had been walking back and forth in…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Perry Education Ass'n v. Perry Local Educators' Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Cornelius v. NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Webb v. State Ex Rel. Arizona Bd. of Medical ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
- State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
- LaFaro v. CahillCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
- State v. MutschlerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
- Bennett v. BrownlowCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.