Hoagland v. Hoagland
Utah Supreme Court
Appeal from the Third District Court, Hon. Ogden Hiles, Judge. Action for the purpose of obtaining permanent alimony-under Chap. 33, p. Ill, Laws of 1896. From a judgment dismissing plaintiff’s action, plaintiff appealed. A judgment which has for its basis a mere blank order is not worth the paper on which it is written, and we do not perceive under what authority it can be held to have any validity whatever. People v. Ray., 12 Pac.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the Third District Court, Hon. Ogden Hiles, Judge. Action for the purpose of obtaining permanent alimony-under Chap. 33, p. Ill, Laws of 1896. From a judgment dismissing plaintiff’s action, plaintiff appealed. A judgment which has for its basis a mere blank order is not worth the paper on which it is written, and we do not perceive under what authority it can be held to have any validity whatever. People v. Ray., 12 Pac. Eep. 160; People v. Mulla/n, 66 Cal., 396; People v. Applegrath, 64 Cal., 229; Chase v. Kay nor, 43 N. W., 269; Platt v. Stewart, 10 Mich., 263. It appears…
1Per curiam
This action was brought in Salt Lake County on October 27, 1897, by the appellant against the respondent for the purpose of obtaining permanent alimony under Chap. 33, p. Ill, Laws of 1896. The parties were married at Buena Yista, Colo., in July, 1881, and lived together in Colorado 'from one to three months. The complaint alleges that one child was born of- the marriage, who is now about 15 years old, residing with the plaintiff; that the defendant is and has been a resident of Utah for five years, and owns real estate and personal property in this State; that during the year 1883, the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hahn v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
- Harris v. LesterIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
- Reily v. LancasterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
- Sharp v. DaugneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
- Amy v. AmyUtah Supreme Court · 1895
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Edwards v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Intermill v. NashUtah Supreme Court · 1938
- Pincock v. KimballUtah Supreme Court · 1924
- McHatton v. RhodesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Boston Acme Mines Development Co. v. ClawsonUtah Supreme Court · 1925
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.