Castro v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Beasley, Judge.
Defendant appeals his conviction of trafficking in cocaine. OCGA § 16-13-31.
1. Defendant asserts he did not consent to the search of his automobile in the trunk of which the contraband was found. He makes this contention on two grounds. The first is that the State did not prove that the translation of the trooper’s request was accurate, that defendant understood it, or that the translation of defendant’s response was accurate. Defendant spoke only a little English, his native tongue being Spanish. The trooper who requested consent spoke to defendant in English at first and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Woodruff v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
- Lamons v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1986
- Boling v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
- Martin v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Lively v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1992
- Dillard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
- Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
- McIntyre v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
- Dillard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.