Legal Opinion

Hansen v. Bank of California, National Ass'n

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 17, 1937No. 26375. Department TwoPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTolman, J.

This appeal is prosecuted hy the plaintiffs from an order striking their third amended complaint and dismissing the action, after demurrers had been sustained, in due course, to the original complaint, to an amended complaint, and to a second amended complaint.

The order appealed from contains the following recitations as the basis for a judgment of dismissal:

“It appearing to the court that the previous complaints filed herein contain references to other causes which demonstrate that the subject matter of the present action is res judicata, and that it is sham and frivolous to file a third…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. German Mexican Co. v. Mexican Pacific Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1931

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Reagh v. HamiltonWashington Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Murray v. AmrineCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1981
  3. Ellingsen v. BennettWashington Supreme Court · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API