Legal Opinion

Duck v. Antle

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 12, 1897PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error from the District Court of Payne County. Suit by Antle against Charles Duck, as principal, and J. W. Duck and A. T .Neill as sureties upon a promissory note, and to foreclose a chattel mortgage given to secure the same. Judgment for plaintiff, from which defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Bieeeb, J.:

Antle brought his suit in the district court of Payne county to recover judgment against J. W. Duck, Charles A. Duck and A. T. Neill upon a promissory note given on April 3, 1895, for the sum of $85,due in ten days after date, with interest at-10 per cent, from maturity, and to foreclose a chattel mortgage given by J. W. Duck to secure this note.

The defendants filed their answer alleging that in the month of November, 1893, the plaintiff, for the purpose of defrauding the defendant, Charles A. Duck, and compelling him, the said Duck, to pay…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Fire Ins. Assn., Ltd. v. WickhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Hennessy v. BaconSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. McKinley v. WatkinsIllinois Supreme Court · 1851
  4. Long v. TowlSupreme Court of Missouri · 1868
  5. Sproat v. DurlandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1894

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hartley v. RileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  2. Hulen v. TruittSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  3. Powers Restaurants, Inc. v. GarrisonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
  4. Roxana Petroleum Co. v. GoldrickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  5. Agristor Credit Corp. v. UnruhSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API