Muller v. Muller
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
URBIGKIT, Justice.
Economic disaster attended these litigants’ construction company, domestic disharmony followed in their marriage and, finally, the wife became seriously ill and in declining health. The trial court’s effort to resolve these difficulties by an award of $100 per month alimony has dissatisfied the husband. He now appeals.
We affirm the trial court.
Gary Muller, appellant, and Pauline Muller, appellee, had been married for about sixteen years when they ended their relationship by a divorce. Three unpleasant occurrences combined to create their marital troubles. The construction…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- In Re Marriage of FlahertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Hickland v. HicklandNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Hanks v. HanksSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
- Paul v. PaulWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
- Grosskopf v. GrosskopfWyoming Supreme Court · 1984
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Reavis v. ReavisWyoming Supreme Court · 1998
- Carlton v. CarltonWyoming Supreme Court · 2000
- Jones v. JonesWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
- Jones v. JonesWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
- Cameron Kdell Bagley v. Angela S. BagleyWyoming Supreme Court · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.