Legal Opinion

Frame v. Maynard

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 18, 2010PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*509Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Paul G. Feinman, J.), entered October 27, 2008, after a bench trial, inter alia, awarding the principal amounts of $421,220.80 to plaintiff, $325,598.54 to cross-claimant Beatrice Guthrie and $162,799.27 to cross-claimant Paulson, and dismissing the cross claims of cross-claimant Hines, unanimously modified, on the law and the facts, the amounts awarded to Guthrie and Paulson vacated, Hines’s cross claims for breach of fiduciary duty and constructive fraud reinstated, and the matter remanded for further proceedings as to damages in accordance with the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Meinhard v. SalmonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Thoreson v. Penthouse International, Ltd.New York Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Sutton v. East River Savings BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. In re the Estate of RothkoNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. Global Minerals & Metals Corp. v. HolmeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Frame v. MaynardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. Lenox Hill Radiology, P.C. v. Tri-State Consumer InsuranceAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API