Legal Opinion
Claim of Werenjchik v. Ulen Contracting Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 27, 1930PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Per curiam
The claimants are entitled to compensation unless there has been a failure of competent proof that they are the surviving children of the deceased employee, or that their respective ages are as found by the State Industrial Board or that they were still in existence at the time of the award. The claimants are, said to reside in Russia. Appellants contend that the birth certificates were insufficient to comply with section 121-a of the Workmen’s Compensation Law because they depend upon the authentication of officials of Soviet Russia, which is not recognized by the United States of America.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Russian Reinsurance Co. v. StoddardNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
- Wulfsohn v. Russian Socialist Federated Soviet RepublicNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Russian Government v. Lehigh Valley R.District Court, S.D. New York · 1919
- Matter of Perino v. Lackawanna Steel Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1925
- Claim of Dauphine v. BlairAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
3Cited by6 opinions
- Salimoff & Co. v. Standard Oil Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
- Botta v. Tosti Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
- In re the Estates of LuksNew York Surrogate's Court · 1965
- In Re Estate of AlexandravicusSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
- Moskowitz v. MillerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.