Legal Opinion
In re the Estates of Luks
New York Surrogate's Court
Decided January 11, 1965PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Joseph A. Cox, S.
The Consuls General of the governments in exile of Latvia and Estonia have moved for orders dismissing the objections to the Public Administrator’s accounts and striking the notices of appearance filed by purported attorneys in fact for alleged distributees in the accounting proceedings. The motions are founded upon the alleged invalidity of the powers of attorney. The attorneys in fact on their part have moved to strike the appearances of the Consuls General, alleging that they are not proper parties to these proceedings, by reason of the designation of specified persons as…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. PinkSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Russian Reinsurance Co. v. StoddardNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
- In Re the Estate of D'AdamoNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
- In Re the Accounting of ZalewskiNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re the Estate of KolodijNew York Surrogate's Court · 1976
- In re the Estate of BielinisNew York Surrogate's Court · 1967