Legal Opinion
Midland Psychiatric Associates, Inc. v. United States
District Court, W.D. Missouri
Decided July 8, 1997No. 96-1245-CV-W-3PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS
SMITH, District Judge.
Pending is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint. 1 For the reasons set forth below, the Motion to Dismiss is granted.
I. BACKGROUND
The following facts are gleaned from the First Amended Complaint and must be considered as true for purposes of the pending motions. The defendants are the United States (the “Government”) and Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company (“Mutual”). Plaintiff provides partial hospitalization services to nursing home residents pursuant to contracts with various hospitals…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Weinberger v. SalfiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Heckler v. RingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Doe v. McMillanSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Supermail Cargo, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Westfall v. ErwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kailash C. Pani, M.D., and Kailash C. Pani, M.D., P.C. v. Empire Blue Cross Blue ShieldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- MIDLAND PSYCHIATRIC ASSOCIATES, INC., Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America; Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company, AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
- Fac, Inc. v. Cooperativa De Seguros De VidaDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2000
- Midland Psychiatric v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998