Housing Authority v. Melanson
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtSpallone, J.
The plaintiff appeals from the trial court’s decision granting the defendant a writ of audita querela1 that stayed the execution of the judgment of immediate possession in a summary process action.
*520The plaintiff claims that the trial court improperly (1) granted the writ of audita querela based on a previously adjudicated issue, (2) granted the equitable remedy of audita querela where the defendant had “unclean hands,” (3) granted a second writ of audita querela, and (4) violated the plaintiffs federal constitutional rights. We do not review these claims because this appeal is moot.
The…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Reynolds v. VroomSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
- Shays v. Local Grievance CommitteeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Connecticut Foundry Co. v. International Ladies Garment Workers UnionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Butzgy v. Town of GlastonburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
3Cited by1 opinion
- Fromer v. Tree WardenConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992