Legal Opinion

Bussey v. Grantham & Son

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 7, 1919No. 10186PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Complaint; from Calhoun superior court—Judge Harrell. April 18, 1918. C. J. Taylor, for plaintiff in error. E. L. Smith, contra.

1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, P. J.

This was an action against the alleged agent *709of an “unauthorized” fire-insurance company, under sections 2443 and 2445 of the Civil Code of 1910. The suit was based upon an insurance policy, a copy of which was attached to the petition, and the petition alleged that the petitioners had “complied with the terms of said policy all the way through.” This allegation was denied in the defendant’s answer; consequently the burden was upon the plaintiff of establishing its truth. Among the printed conditions upon the face of the policy was the following: “This entire policy . . shall be void, if . .…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ætna Insurance v. TrimmierCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
  2. Citizens' Bank & Trust Co. v. Scott & SandersCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1933
  3. Volunteer State Life Insurance v. McGinnisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1920
  4. Firemen's Insurance Co. v. HambyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API