Legal Opinion

Arnold v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided March 26, 2002No. 0143012PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUMPHREYS, Judge.

Carlton William Arnold appeals his conviction, after a jury trial, for second degree murder. Arnold contends that the trial court erred in: 1) refusing to instruct the jury that duress could be considered in determining whether the Commonwealth had proven the elements of murder; 2) refusing to instruct the jury that heat of passion negated the element of malice when there was evidence of duress; and 3) in refusing to instruct the jury on manslaughter. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the conviction.

I. Background

During the early morning hours of September 22, 1998, a gas…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Lavinder v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1991
  2. Frye v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1986
  3. LeVasseur v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1983
  4. Darnell v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1988
  5. Barrett v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1986

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Mouberry v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2003
  2. Mark Lee v. Harold ClarkeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015
  3. James Edward Williams v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2015
  4. McMillan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
  5. Adriana Rodriguez v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API