Legal Opinion

Allen v. Roydhouse

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided June 5, 1916No. 2962PublishedCited by 5 opinions

At Raw. Action by William F. Allen, receiver, against George W. Roydhouse. Sur motion by plaintiff for a new trial.

1Opinion of the Court

DICKINSON, District Judge.

The trial of this case was conducted with conspicuous ability and in a justice-seeking spirit, and with a display of fairness and frankness which is refreshing. The defense was presented with a like ability and in a like spirit. The trial, so far as within the control of counsel, could not have been more satisfactory or conducted with greater ability. This removes from the case as now presented all except the appellate questions which arise out of the trial, and disposes of all features which call for an exercise of the power of the court to interfere with the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. StewartSupreme Court of the United States · 1916

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Morris v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1946
  2. Barnes v. AndrewsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1924
  3. Otis & Co. v. Pennsylvania R. Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1945
  4. Anderson v. BundySupreme Court of Virginia · 1933
  5. Morris v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API