Legal Opinion

Morris v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 27, 1946No. 10967PublishedCited by 71 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHENS, Circuit Judge.

William Morris was informed against in four counts and went to trial before a jury under his plea of not guilty as to each count. At the conclusion of the government’s case, defendant made a motion for directed verdicts as to each count, but the court, with the tacit acquiescence of defendant and the government, treated the motion as one to dismiss, and granted it as to Counts 3 and 4, and denied it as to Counts 1 and 2.1

Counts 1 and 2 each charge the violation of the Emergency Price Control Act of 1942 as amended, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 901 et seq., and Regulations…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Screws v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Sparf v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. Bird v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  4. United States v. LevyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1946
  5. Kreiner v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by71 opinions

  1. Tatum v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
  2. United States v. SpockCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1969
  3. Brooktree Corporation, Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
  4. State v. ButlerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
  5. United States v. MoylanCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1969

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API