Legal Opinion

Brennan v. Paramount Pictures Corporation

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided September 20, 1962PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAWSON, District Judge.

This is a motion for summary judgment brought by defendant Paramount Pictures Corporation (Paramount) under Rule 56(b) of the Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. 1 In accordance with General Rule 9(g) of the General Rules of the United States District Courts for the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York Paramount has filed a separate statement of material facts alleged not to be at issue. 2 Plaintiff, Joseph Payne Brennan, has failed to submit a controverting statement and in accordance with the provisions of Rule 9(g) the statement of facts submitted by…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Van Huffel v. HarkelrodeSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. In re Franklin Brewing Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1918
  3. Alexander v. Irving Trust CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1955
  4. Federal Land Bank of Baltimore v. KurtzCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1934
  5. Hoffman v. Santly-Joy, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1943

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Geisel v. Poynter Products, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1968
  2. Jones v. Virgin Records, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API