Legal Opinion

Joseph E. Shurance, Plaintiff-Respondent v. Planning Control International, Inc., Defendant-Petitioner

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 18, 1988No. 87-8247PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Petitioner (PCI) seeks leave under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) to appeal the district court’s denial of PCI’s motion to disqualify opposing counsel. 1 Before the district court, PCI argued that counsel should be disqualified for violating professional ethics by contacting a former PCI employee and obtaining privileged information about that employee’s communications with PCI’s corporate counsel.

The issue is whether we may review the denial of a disqualification motion certified for immediate appeal under section 1292(b). This section allows for appeals of interlocutory orders which involve “a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. RisjordSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Richardson-Merrell Inc. v. Koller Ex Rel. KollerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. In Re Cement Antitrust Litigation (Mdl No. 296). State of Arizona v. Ideal Basic Industries, State of Arizona v. United States District Court for the District of Arizona, and Kaiser Cement and Gypsum Corporation, Real Parties in Interest. State of Arizona v. Ash Grove Cement CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  5. E. L. Cord, Etc. v. Calvin J. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Rieve v. Coventry Health Care, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2012
  2. Mateo v. M/S KISODistrict Court, N.D. California · 1992
  3. UMG Recordings, Inc. v. MySpace, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2007
  4. Merle Norman Cosmetics, Inc. v. United States District Court, Central District of California, James L. Kemper, Real Party in InterestCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  5. Stiner v. Brookdale Senior Living, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2019

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API