Legal Opinion

State v. Foster

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 8, 1920No. 22,764PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Greenwood district court; Allison T. Ayres, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, C. J.:

E. K. Clark was convicted of the offense of drawing the casing from an abandoned oil well without plugging it as the statute prescribes.

In his appeal he contends that he is not within the application of the statute under which he was prosecuted. It appears that H. V. Foster was the owner of the well, and that defendant was the operator who had charge of the drilling and other operations in exploring for oil. Both Foster and Clark were charged with the commission of the offense, but Foster was not' arrested, and the prosecution proceeded…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. YoungSupreme Court of Kansas · 1895
  2. State v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Ferguson v. American Savings Stamp Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1965
  2. State v. SleethCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1983
  3. State v. FinleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1967
  4. State v. VakasSupreme Court of Kansas · 1987
  5. John M. Denman Oil Co. v. State Corp. Commission of the StateCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2015

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API