Cauble v. City of Asheville
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
VAUGHN, Chief Judge.
The central issue on this appeal involves the meaning of the term “clear proceeds.” The threshold question in this case, whether funds collected from overtime parking violations constitute penalties or fines within the meaning of Article IX, Section 7 of the North Carolina Constitution, the clear proceeds of which shall belong to the county for maintaining free public schools, has already been decided. In Cauble I, as affirmed by Cauble II, the Court of Appeals and subsequently the Supreme Court held that such monies collected are indeed fines resulting from “a breach of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Masters v. DunstanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Thompson v. LassiterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Southern Express Co. v. Commonwealth of VirginiaSupreme Court of Virginia · 1895
- Sutton v. . PhillipsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
- Horner v. Chamber of CommerceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Richmond County Board of Education v. CowellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
- Cauble v. City of AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- Shavitz v. City of High PointCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
- SUGAR CREEK CHARTER SCHOOL, INC. v. StateCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
- Purser v. Mecklenburg CountyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.