Legal Opinion

Oertel v. Phillips

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 11, 1966No. 44,486PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Fatzer, J.;

This appeal is predicated upon the order of the district court granting the defendant’s motion for a new trial.

This action was commenced by the plaintiff-appellant, William D. Oertel, a minor, by and through Joseph G. Oertel, his father and next kin, against the defendant-appellee, Florence A. Phillips, to recover damages for personal injuries resulting from a vehicular collision at the intersection of Broadway and Pennsylvania Streets in the city of Leavenworth. The appellant was a fifteen-year-old boy operating his motor scooter with a…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Montgomery Ward & Co. v. DuncanSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Elzig v. GudwangenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1937
  3. Finn v. American Fire & Casualty Co. American Fire & Casualty Co. v. FinnCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953
  4. Depinto v. Provident Security Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
  5. Marshall's U. S. Auto Supply, Inc. v. CashmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Harsch v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  2. Landscape Development Co. v. Kansas City Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1966
  3. Kansas State Highway Commission v. RoepkeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1968
  4. National Education Ass'n v. Unified School District No. 501Supreme Court of Kansas · 1996
  5. Moll v. StateCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2009

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API