Legal Opinion
Rieger v. Group Health Ass'n
District Court, N.D. Mississippi
Decided May 2, 1994No. EC 91-218-D-DPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
WINGATE, District Judge.
Before the court are various motions submitted by the defendants wherein they urge the court to dismiss plaintiffs claims against them pursuant to Rules 56,1 12(b)(1) and (b)(6),2 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Charging that the defendants have violated the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (hereinafter “ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq., the plaintiff invokes the jurisdiction of this court under 28 U.S.C. § 13313 and 29 U.S.C. § 216.4
Defendants’ Rule 56 motion attacks the entirety of plaintiffs ease. Plaintiff Darold L. Rutland,…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. ThurstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Oscar Mayer & Co. v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Norma Rollins v. Techsouth, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Rieger v. Group Health Ass'nDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1994