Legal Opinion

103 Investors I, LP v. Square D Company

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided June 23, 2004No. 02-3345PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LUCERO, Circuit Judge.

At the heart of this appeal is a dispute over the admissibility of expert testimony in relation to the cause of a fire that occurred in the building of 103 Investors I, L.P. (“Investors”) on March 1, 2001. Square D Company (“Square D”), which manufactures electrical equipment, manufactured the building’s busways. Investors alleges that those busways caused the fire and seeks to introduce expert testimony toward the goal'of demonstrating that allegation.

Late in the discovery process, Investors attempted to add an additional party or, in the alternative, voluntarily…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Summers v. Missouri Pacific Railroad SystemCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
  3. Phillips Usa, Inc. v. Allflex Usa, Inc., and N.J. Phillips Pty., LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
  4. Rishell v. Jane Phillips Episcopal Memorial Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
  5. 103 Investors I, L.P. v. Square D Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 2002

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Rimbert v. Eli Lilly and Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
  2. 103 Investors I, LP v. Square D CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
  3. Certain Underwriters v. Cameron Intl Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020
  4. Tyree v. Boston Scientific Corp.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2014
  5. Warden v. Exempla, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2012

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API