Legal Opinion

Huber v. JLG Industries, Inc.

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided May 19, 2003No. CIV.A.00-40079-NMGPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

GORTON, District Judge.

In August, 2002, a jury returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff Carl Huber (“Huber”) for $5 million for injuries he sustained as a result of the breach of an implied warranty of merchantability by defendant JLG Industries, Inc. (“JLG”). The breach was with respect to either a design defect in, or a failure to warn in the instructions accompanying, JLG’s AM-24 AccessMaster manlift. The jury assessed 60% of the award ($3 million) for the partial seizure disorder that Huber sustained thereby.

JLG now moves this Court for judgment as a matter of law…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Wagenmann v. AdamsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
  5. Savino Dagnello v. Long Island Rail Road CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. First Act Inc. v. Brook Mays Music Co., Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2006
  2. Chrabaszcz v. Johnston School CommitteeDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2007
  3. Lentz v. City of ClevelandDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API