Legal Opinion
Griffin v. Focus Brands, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Georgia
Decided May 12, 2015No. CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:15-CV-00170-ATPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED1 ORDER
Amy Totenberg, United States District Judge
This matter is before the Court on Defendant FOCUS Brands, Inc.’s (“FB”) Motion to Dismiss [Doc. 6]. For the following reasons, the Motion is GRANTED.
*1267I. BACKGROUND FACTS
At this stage, the facts alleged in the Complaint are accepted as true. Plaintiff Griffin operates a solo dermatology practice called Intown Dermatology. (ComplJ 3.) As a condition of service, Plaintiff requires her patients to assign their health insurance benefits to her. (Id.)
In March of 2013, Plaintiff performed two surgical procedures on patient SD, whose insurance…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Venture Associates Corporation, a Tennessee Corporation v. Zenith Data Systems Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund, a Pension Trust v. Gerber Truck Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- Cagle v. BrunerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Griffin v. Humana Employers Health Plan of Georgia, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2016
- Griffin v. Sevatec, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2016
- Griffin v. Sevatec, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2016