Peterson v. Foll
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Winnebago Circuit Court. • Plaintiff brought this action to recover the value of a horse on which he claims to have had a chattel mortgage, and which he alleges defendant caused to be levied on and sold on process issued in a proceeding against the mortgagor. There was a verdict and judgment for plaintiff. Defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtReed, J.
' X. CONVERsion of prop-attachment?1 n'frden of pioo£' I. Plaintiff alleges in liis petition that one Games executed and delivered to him a chattel mortgage on a horse, to indemnify him against liability on a , . ° J promissory note which he had signed as securitv *'or sa^ Games, and that he subsequently paid off discharged the debt evidenced by said note. lie also alleges that defendant commenced a suit against said Games on a money demand, in which he procured a writ of attachment to be issued, and caused the same to be levied on said horse, and that he afterwards obtained judgment on his…
2Cited by15 opinions
- Livingston v. StevensSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
- Barrett v. MagnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
- Frick-Reid Supply Co. v. HunterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- McIntosh v. KnoxNevada Supreme Court · 1917
- Fisher v. PorterSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1898
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.