Legal Opinion
Tatum v. RJR Pension Investment Committee
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided April 28, 2017No. 16-1293PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*556DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ, Circuit Judge:
This Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”) case returns to us for a third time. The beneficiaries of an ERISA retirement plan appeal the judgment, issued after a full bench trial, that the fiduciary’s breach of its duty of procedural prudence did not cause the substantial losses in the retirement plan resulting from the sale of non-employer stock funds. We had previously remanded the case to the district court so that it could apply the correct legal standard for determining loss causation, but we expressed no opinion as to the proper outcome of…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Agostini v. FeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Amgen Inc. v. Connecticut Retirement Plans and Trust FundsSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Tibble v. Edison Int'lSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Minnie Florence Breeden v. Caspar W. Weinberger, Secretary Health, Education, and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1974
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Jones v. Amerihealth CaritasDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
- Jeffrey Quatrone v. Gannett Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2020
- Planned Parenthood South Atlantic v. Robert KerrCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2024
- Planned Parenthood South Atlantic v. Robert KerrCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2022
- Heather Cogdell v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2026
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.