Legal Opinion

HARLEY-DAVIDSON v. Columbia Tristar Home Video

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided May 3, 1994No. 93-C-428Published

1Opinion of the Court

851 F.Supp. 1265 (1994)

HARLEY-DAVIDSON, INC., Plaintiff,

v.

COLUMBIA TRISTAR HOME VIDEO, INC., New Line Cinema Corp., and New Line Home Video, Defendants.

No. 93-C-428.

United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin.

May 3, 1994.

Fred Wiviott, Michael E. Husmann, Dyann L. Bumpke, Jonathan H. Margolies, Michael, Best & Friedrich, Milwaukee, WI, for plaintiff.

Gary A. Essmann, Andrus, Sceales, Starke & Sawall, Milwaukee, WI, Joseph J. Santora, Larry Greenfield, Santora & Greenfield, New York City, for defendants.

DECISION AND ORDER

WARREN, District Judge.

On April 28, 1993, plaintiff Harley-Davidson, Inc.…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Leroy v. Great Western United Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Margaret E. Coffey v. Van Dorn Iron Works, an Ohio CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
  3. Dakota Industries, Inc. v. Dakota Sportswear, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
  4. Ve Holding Corporation v. Johnson Gas Appliance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
  5. Phillip E. Bates, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Defendant v. C & S Adjusters, Inc., Defendant-Appellee-Cross-ClaimantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API