Legal Opinion

Duran v. Andrew

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided April 5, 2010No. Misc. No. 2009-0730Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ______________________________ DANIEL DURAN, ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) Miscellaneous No. 09-730 (HHK/AK) ) CHRISTOPHER ANDREW, ) Defendant. ) ______________________________) MEMORANDUM OPINION Pending before this Court is Non-Party [Petitioner] Alex Menendez’s Motion to Quash Subpoena (“Motion to Quash”) [1]; Defendant’s opposition to the Motion (“Opposition”) [4]; and Non-Party’s reply to the Opposition (“Reply”) [5]. This matter is pending in this Court only for determination of the instant Motion to Quash; the underlying civil action,…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. United States v. NoblesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Mead Data Central, Inc. v. United States Department of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API