Legal Opinion

Kirkland v. Levin

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 31, 1923No. Civ. No. 3786PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWorks, J.

The two actions above entitled were tried upon the same evidence, although there was in .the trial court no order for their consolidation. There is here, however, a stipulation that they may be heard together, and the appeals stand before us under one number. The cases will, therefore, be treated in a single opinion.

Each of the plaintiffs was at one time a stockholder in a certain corporation. The stock holdings of each were advertised for sale for unpaid assessments. Defendant purchased at the assessment sale the stock thus advertised. Shortly thereafter plaintiffs repurchased the stock from…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ramage v. GouldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Franck v. J. J. Sugarman-Rudolph Co.California Supreme Court · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API