Legal Opinion

Haxton v. Haxton

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 8, 1984No. 78-0873 and 15-82-08058 CA A27976PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarden, J.

Father appeals from a judgment of the trial court requiring him to pay $225 monthly for support of his mentally handicapped son, James, who is over the age of majority and is not attending school. We reverse.

Mother first sought to require father to contribute to the support of James by a motion to modify the decree of dissolution of their marriage. Two months later, she commenced a separate action for his support as a dependent child, first in her own name and, later, by an amended complaint as guardian ad litem for James. The two proceedings were consolidated for trial.

At the time of trial,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Coastal Adjustment Bureau, Inc. v. WehnerOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Langnese v. LangneseCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
  3. State Ex Rel. Adult & Family Services Division v. LesterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Towery v. TowerySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
  2. Matter of Marriage of Haxton and HaxtonOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Towery v. TowerySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API