Towery v. Towery
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Darrell Hickman, Justice.
The general rule is that once a child reaches majority and is physically and mentally normal, the legal duty of the parents to support that child ceases. The question in this case is whether that duty can be reimposed later if the adult child becomes disabled and needs support. The answer is that the law imposes no such duty regardless of what the moral obligation may be. The facts in this case are largely undisputed.
Timothy Dewitt Towery was 17 when his parents divorced in August, 1980. The Towerys had two other grown children and no provision for their care and…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Koltay v. KoltaySupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
- Grapin v. GrapinSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
- Breuer v. DowdenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1925
- Upchurch v. UpchurchSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1938
- Brown v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Nelson v. NelsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
- Van Camp v. Van CampSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
- Kuchmas v. KuchmasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
- Babb v. MatlockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
- Riggs v. RiggsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.