Legal Opinion

Rosenbaum v. Dunston

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1884PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to the district court for Cass county. Tried below before Morris, J., sitting for Pound, J. cited: Comp. Stat., chap. 50, § 19. Geere v. Sweet, 2 Neb., 76. Beach v. Oramer, 5 Neb., 98. Ray vv Mason, 6 Id., 101. Martin v. Grover, 9 Id., 263. This action is on liquor dealer’s bond, and law says u damages and expenses ” may be recovered in any court of competent jurisdiction. Expenses and costs are synonymous. 1 Bouvier, 370.

1Opinion of the Court

Cobb, Ch. J.

This is a petition in error to the judgment of the district court of Cass county, and is based upon the overruling of the motion of the plaintiff in error, to retax the costs in the case, or rather to tax the costs in the case to the defendant in error, who was the plaintiff in the court below.

The action was commenced by the defendant in error against the plaintiff in error, in the county court, where she recovered a judgment in the sum of $205 under the provisions of section 15, chapter 50 of the Compiled Statutes. The defendant appealed the cause to the district court, where a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ray v. MasonNebraska Supreme Court · 1877

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Woodrough v. Douglas CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Shellenbarger v. ShellenbargerNebraska Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Deck v. KautzNebraska Supreme Court · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API