Marsh v. Buck
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Black
Most of the questions presented by this case are the same as those that were raised in Watson v. Buck, ante, p. 387. Here, as there, at the request of ASCAP and its co-complainants a federal District Court composed of three judges enjoined various, state, officials from enforcing a state statute 1 aimed primarily at price-fixing com binations operating in the field of public performance of copyright music. 2 Here, as there, the complainants alleged, and the defendants denied, that enforcement of the act had been threatened. Here, as there, the court below found that threats had been made,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Scott v. FlowersNebraska Supreme Court · 1901
- Buck v. SwansonDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1939
- Petersen v. BealNebraska Supreme Court · 1931
3Cited by18 opinions
- Oregon v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Interstate Hotel Co. v. Remick Music Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1946
- Monroe v. PapeDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1963
- Remick Music Corp. v. Interstate Hotel Co. of NebraskaDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1944
- Linkenhoger v. Owens Linkenhoger v. SandersCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1950
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.