Legal Opinion

Petersen v. Beal

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1931No. 27674PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEberly, J.

House Roll 306 (Laws 1929, ch. 147), entitled “An act relating to taxicabs and public cars and providing for the filing of insurance policies, surety bonds or securities with the state railway commission for the protection of the public ; and to provide penalties for the violation thereof,” was enacted by the legislature of 1929 and duly approved by the executive on April 6 of that year.

Section 1 thereof defines the terms “taxicab” and “public car.” Sections 2 and 3, as a prerequisite to the operation of a taxicab and of a public car as thus defined, require the deposit with the Nebraska…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Prentis v. Atlantic Coast Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Packard v. BantonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. Davis v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  4. Ex parte DickeyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Sprout v. City of South BendSupreme Court of the United States · 1928

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. State Railway Commission v. RamseyNebraska Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Marsh v. BuckSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. In re Yellow Cab & Baggage Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Swanson v. SorensenNebraska Supreme Court · 1967
  5. State v. MannNebraska Supreme Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API